In this guide, we will cover the five pillars of SOC 2 compliance and how they relate to artificial intelligence. Then, we’ll provide a seven-step framework for responsible and compliant AI adoption.
In May 2023, Samsung faced a crisis that would reshape how many organizations think about AI governance. According to reports, employees had leaked sensitive internal code through ChatGPT not once, but three times. The incident forced Samsung Electronics to ban generative AI tools entirely. This wasn't just a data leak – it was a wake-up call for organizations worldwide about the intersection of AI usage and compliance.
The same month, Apple made headlines when they restricted employee use of ChatGPT and other external AI tools, as reported by The Wall Street Journal. These weren't isolated incidents – they were symptoms of a broader challenge: how do organizations maintain security standards and SOC 2 compliance in an era where AI tools are becoming ubiquitous?
The financial implications are stark. IBM's 2024 Cost of a Data Breach Report reveals that the average cost of a data breach reached $4.45 million in 2023, a 15% increase over three years. While this figure covers all types of breaches, it underscores the potential cost of failing to properly govern AI tool usage.
In this guide, we will cover the five pillars of SOC 2 compliance and how they relate to artificial intelligence. Then, we’ll provide a seven-step framework for responsible and compliant AI adoption.
SOC 2's Trust Services Criteria were designed to be technology-neutral and adaptable to new challenges. While the SOC 2 framework was created before the widespread adoption of generative AI, its principles provide a robust foundation for governing AI usage across all five Trust Services Criteria.
AI systems introduce unique security challenges as they often require broad data access to function effectively. Incidents like Samsung's code leak through ChatGPT demonstrate why robust security controls are essential for AI governance. These controls must protect against unauthorized access while enabling legitimate AI use.
Access controls are a key component of meeting SOC 2 security requirements. These controls define who can use AI systems and how access is managed. Organizations should maintain:
System protection measures form the backbone of AI security infrastructure. These safeguards ensure that data remains protected throughout the entire AI processing lifecycle:
Organizations increasingly rely on AI systems for critical operations, making system availability crucial. When AI tools become unavailable, it can disrupt essential business processes and impact decision-making capabilities. Maintaining consistent access while preserving security requires careful balance.
Reliability is crucial for organizations depending on AI systems for critical operations. These controls ensure AI tools are available when needed and perform consistently:
Business continuity planning ensures organizations can maintain operations even when AI systems face challenges. These measures provide a safety net for AI-dependent processes:
AI systems must produce reliable, accurate results for organizations to trust their output. Processing integrity ensures that AI tools handle data correctly throughout the entire processing lifecycle, from input validation to output verification. This becomes especially critical when AI systems inform important business decisions.
Input validation serves as the first line of defense against processing errors. These controls ensure that AI systems work with reliable, appropriate data:
Output verification ensures AI systems produce trustworthy results. These controls protect against the risks of incorrect or inappropriate AI outputs:
AI tools present unique confidentiality challenges because they can retain and potentially expose sensitive information in unexpected ways. Organizations must carefully control what data enters AI systems and ensure proper protection throughout the AI processing lifecycle.
Information classification is fundamental to maintaining confidentiality in AI systems. Without proper classification, organizations can't effectively protect sensitive data from unauthorized exposure:
Data protection measures safeguard confidential information throughout its lifecycle in AI systems. These controls prevent unauthorized access and exposure:
Depending on your use case, AI systems might process personal information, making privacy protection essential. Organizations must balance AI capabilities with privacy requirements, ensuring compliance with regulations while maintaining AI effectiveness. This requires careful attention to data minimization, individual rights, and ongoing privacy operations.
Data minimization reduces privacy risks by limiting personal information exposure in AI systems. These controls help prevent unnecessary data collection and processing:
Individual rights protection ensures AI systems respect privacy choices. These controls help organizations meet privacy requirements and build trust:
Privacy operations maintain ongoing protection of personal information. These processes ensure consistent privacy standards across AI systems:
Now that we’ve covered the basic criteria of SOC 2 compliance, let’s outline seven steps organizations can take to maintain compliance while responsibly managing AI adoption.
Every organization that allows AI tools should establish clear guidelines for use. This is crucial following documented incidents like Samsung's data leak through ChatGPT. Clear guidelines mean documented policies and procedures that define how AI tools can be used within your organization, including:
Continuous monitoring is essential to maintain security and catch potential issues early. With AI systems processing sensitive data, organizations need robust monitoring procedures that include:
Given the rapid evolution of AI capabilities, organizations must ensure all users understand how to use these tools responsibly. A comprehensive training program includes:
SOC 2 compliance requires maintaining detailed records of your AI governance program. This documentation serves as evidence of your controls and helps track changes over time. Key documents include:
AI systems and their risks evolve constantly, requiring regular evaluation to ensure controls remain effective. This process must include:
Despite best preventive measures, incidents may occur. Organizations need a clear plan for handling AI-related security incidents that includes:
As AI technology evolves and organizational needs change, your governance program must adapt. Effective change management requires clear procedures for:
The intersection of AI and SOC 2 compliance isn't just about preventing incidents like those at Samsung and Apple – it's about building a sustainable framework for responsible AI usage. Organizations that successfully adapt their SOC 2 programs to encompass AI tools will be better positioned to innovate safely and maintain compliance.
Remember: SOC 2's Trust Services Criteria were designed to be technology-neutral and adaptable to new challenges. By applying these fundamental principles to AI governance, organizations can build robust, compliant programs that protect against emerging risks while enabling innovation.
The key is to view AI governance not as a separate initiative, but as an extension of your existing SOC 2 compliance program, guided by the AICPA's comprehensive criteria and informed by real-world experiences and incidents.
Experience smarter enterprise sign-on tools & reporting.